Guardian’s view on vaccine sharing: Protecting others protects us from the corona virus

Can naked self-interest be achieved by those who have clearly failed to realize justice? Perhaps the G7 summit on Friday offered some hope that, after all, rich countries are waking up to the need to share vaccines more evenly with the rest of the world. Doses over 193m Given globally, Which includes more than 16 million people in the UK – 130 countries have yet to receive a single dose.

Boris Johnson, the host of the meeting, called on countries to help reduce vaccine development time, and promised to donate more to poor countries – but only once to their British citizens. Polio drops will also be given. (Polling shows that the population is probably more than three times Help sharing extra food As they have to keep “only then.”) Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron has urged Europe and the United States to send up to 5 vaccines to poorer countries now – although the United States will soon To end

What has changed? Mr Macron warned of an “extraordinary increase” in global inequality. But he was also clear enough to refer to the emerging “war of influence.” The G7 countries are worried that others are benefiting from the food they have failed to distribute. China and Russia have supplied more than 800 million meals to 41 countries.

These countries certainly have their own diplomatic agendas and economic interests to pursue. Small and large donations are reinforced by large commercial deals. But, they are at least providing what is desperately needed. There is also India Sending millions of food The Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine – manufactured at the Serum Institute of India – in Bangladesh and other South Asian countries, with a view to China’s regional influence.

It is difficult to see that countries that have not yet supplied any food can try to claim a moral high ground in these circumstances, and are forced to refuse to look at geopolitics when humanitarian concerns I have failed. By international standards, the UK has been a generous donor to the Cox’s Pold Purchase Scheme, which will lead to the start of vaccine delivery. From the end of this month. But charities say the G7 countries have ordered a maximum of 1.5 billion vaccines that need to cover their entire population, hampering their ability to buy enough Covacs equipment. Rich countries are proud to effectively provide cash to poor countries to buy food – while clearing all available goods in their shopping carts.

The second incentive to action is the emergence of highly motivated migrants, including the United Kingdom, Brazil and South Africa, and existing vaccines that may not be as effective against it. The head of the UK’s genetic surveillance program has made a suggestion found in Kent – which could increase the risk of death. The overwhelming pressure of the world. Worryingly, the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine may be less protective against the South African variety.

The temptation for rich countries to submit the various vaccines they have ordered is to ensure that they have the best to protect their citizens when new varieties are introduced. There are options. That would be a big mistake. The more deliveries there are, the more variations are likely to occur – and the more likely it is that they will have vaccine avoidance variations. They will not be restricted to national boundaries, not even the recent travel ban. The South African variety has reached at least 20 countries. The real lesson is that we should distribute vaccines not only for the benefit of other countries, but also for our own benefit.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *