Historian William Dalrymple says Britain should set up a “museum of colonies” where children can learn about “really terrible things in our past.”
Delrimple, Discussion in the final debate in Jaipur Literature Festival (JLF) has asked whether statues of former imperialist heroes in Britain who will now be seen as war criminals should be kept in the neo-colonial museum, or where they live, while ” Of course, most don’t want to see the nation’s statue smashed. “People will have to be” discriminated against “after the debate over the demolition of the Silver Edward Colston statue in Bristol in June.
“When we go to Germany, we do not expect Hitler or Nazi war criminals or any SS officer to stand trial, and we must eliminate war criminals from our country.” “It’s not about waking up or having a fashion or a trend, it’s really about being realistic about some of the horrible things that happened in our past and will teach our children. If we can colonize them. If we keep it in the museum, it is an opportunity to teach, because we can set up a museum, which will fail the curriculum at that time.
The historian pointed to statues of characters such as Brigadier General John Nicholson, who proposed “living, punishing or burning” the killers of (British) women and children, and He refers in his book The last Mughal as a “royal psychiatrist” with a “brutal ability of extreme aggression and cruelty”.
In Northern Ireland, Nicholson is currently preceded in death by two statues, while a statue of Sir Colin Campbell stands at Clydeside, but he is the man who sealed Sepius. [British-employed Indian soldiers] Before the cannon is blown out of the mouth, put blood licks in the B-baghar and lick the blood.
Maj. Gen. Sir Henry Hallock did the same thing and killed between Lucknow and Kanpur, among about 100,000 non-combatants, between Campbell and himself. These are the people we will describe anywhere as war criminals.
Delerimple said the history curriculum for British school children “sees them moving from Henry VIII to Wilbur Force and gives the impression that the British Empire has always been about freeing slaves and racism.” “
“What the British did in India and elsewhere is not just taught in the curriculum and it is a problem,” Delerimple said. “When the British go out into the world, they don’t know what they know about the Indian Raj or the Irish potato famine. What do you know about it? We need to teach it in our schools and the opportunity to set up a colonial museum with some of the war criminals and other statues I think is an opportunity we should take.
Historian Edward Chancellor also disagreed, speaking at the JLF. “The current sculpture is part of a movement with its abrogated culture, condemnation, forced confession, censorship, intolerance and deep intelligence,” he said.
“Give them an inch and no statue will stand,” he added. “It is an attack on the values of the Enlightenment and supports cultural sophistication,” he said. Behind it is an amazing view of history that is neutral, one-sided and immovable. It cannot be understood or accepted that different eras have different values and the historian must strive impartially.
Journalist Sopan Das Gupta, who was also speaking at the debate, was similarly opposed to the removal of the statues. “History could never have been written on the basis of what a statue looks like in Bristol,” he said. “This is not an attempt to rewrite history, nor is it an attempt to rewrite history,” he said. It really is as important as the history of airbrushing, throwing out a lot of uncertified things, and believing in the cleansing of the past to make it clear to modern ethics.
When asked if the statue should be unveiled at the Colonial Museum in the UK, 53 per cent of respondents said they should have, while 47 per cent said they should not.
STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ