Let’s Start this Interesting Article Shared on DesiNew.xyz
The court said during the university’s appeal hearing, “If you (DU) are so clean, why do you feel so in danger? Why are you taking it personally? The committee only deals with students’ complaints Is watching. ” August 7 order of single judge.
Variation believes that the reorganization of its GRC reflects its reputation and the poor position of former members of the committee.
It urged the bench to allow its functions to be carried out without any external interference or anyone else doing its work.
Variety also suggested that the earlier four-member committee be retained and that it could be headed by retired High Court judges.
However, the bench refused to accept the suggestion.
Instead, suggested an alternative – that one of the dropped members be made part of the reorganized GRC, which could turn it into a six-member body, with the chairman, a retired HC judge, who would cast the voting vote – Was accepted by DU.
Subsequently, the bench included Professor SC Rai, who was earlier removed from GRC as the sixth member of the committee and directed that it would be functional from Friday.
The court said that the number of all the members of the committee should be presented to the chairman and directed that GRC for its meeting on 17 August or as directed by the chairman.
To this extent only, the bench revised the August 7 order of the single judge, which had reconstituted GRC as a five-member body headed by an HC judge.
The bench in its order also clarified that the reorganization of GRC neither imposes on the integrity of the appellant-university nor interferes with its authority.
“In fact, selecting committee members who are not part of the university, but have enough experience, will only increase their stature and more support the fairness of the process, when it is headed by a retired judge. High. Court, ”the court said.
It also stated that the aforesaid order has been passed “only to allay appellant-university apprehensions that any asphalt is cast on its integrity only because the single judge reorganized the committee.”
While disposing of the appeal by the Bench, the Bench said, “The whole purpose of including external members in the committee is to make it independent and pelusid, which can hardly be defective.”
Meanwhile, in related proceedings before a single judge on an application by the GRC, claiming that Varsity was not cooperating in its functioning, DU officials assured Justice Prathiba M Singh that the committee would, as per the August 7 order Will work
In view of the assurance given by DU, Justice Singh disposed of the application made by GRC.
As per the UGC guidelines, a petition for final year undergraduate courses was filed on August 7 by Anupam and others challenging the university’s decision to conduct the Open Year Examination (OBE).
The exam started from 10 August and is going on till 31 August.
DU had told the court that students who would survive online OBEs would be given the chance to appear in physical examinations.
The single judge also reconstituted a five-member Grievance Redressal Committee under the aegis of retired Justice Prathiba Rani to deal with all the complaints of the students and said that the panel will continue with the OBE and the grievances of the students will be resolved. Five days.
STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ