Indian BJP leaders acquitted over Babri Masjid demolition

Must Read

Joe Biden casts early votes for US presidential election

Washington: Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has an early vote in his home state of Delaware for the November...

Study: Climate scientists fly more often than other subjects

New Delhi: Climate change researchers are trying to reduce their carbon footprint by avoiding air travel, but a new...

Sargodha woman says husband handed her over to friends who raped her for 21 days

Statement of Harm to Women - News / FilesA Sargodha woman has gone to court against her husband, claiming...

A special court has acquitted all senior figures of India’s ruling party of their role in the demolition of the Babri Masjid by Hindu rioters, and in a further victory for the Hindu nationalist government at the disputed holy site.

All 32 people, including former Deputy Prime Minister LK Advani, three leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and a BJP politician, were cleared of inciting violence in 1992, leaving 16 in the city. A mosque of the 20th century was built. An armed Hindu nationalist mob tore down Ayodhya.

The mob, which included BJP members and the militant Hindu nationalist organization RSS, alleged that the mosque stood on the ruins of a Hindu temple built for Lord Ram.

The demolition of the building led to religious riots in India, killing about 2,000 people, mostly Muslims. The incident is an important moment in India’s deep disintegration along sectarian lines.

Bringing the 28-year-old Dastan closer, the judge ruled that the demolition of the mosque was a conspiracy by a mob.

“Contradictory elements brought down this structure. The accused leaders tried to stop them, ”said Srinivasa Kumar Yadav, presiding over a special court hearing in Lucknow, India.

The trial actually named 49 people, but 17 people were killed during the nearly three-decade-long operation. Twenty-six of the 32 nominees in the case were present for the verdict, which was accompanied by tight security. However, Advani, 92, was told to stay home due to code risks.

A commission spent 17 years investigating the demolition and several witnesses testified that it was planned, even rehearsed, and that professionals were assured of its destruction. Was brought to the site to be created.

The decision proved controversial. A BJP spokesman said he welcomed Wednesday’s decision as “steadfast” but some politicians, including Sitaram Yechury of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), said it was “a complete itch of justice”. ” Is.

This is the second court decision on the Ayodhya site that is on the Hindu nationalist agenda of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. For more than a decade, the BJP had made the restoration of Ayodhya a key stone policy for Hindus.

In November, the Supreme Court of India awarded Hindus a fiercely competitive mosque site, paving the way for a new temple dedicated to Lord Rama. In August, Modi presided over the first stone-laying ceremony for the construction of the temple and praised the “beginning of a new era”.

Kill Camredi, author of The Republic of India: A Short History of New India, said that the obvious burden of the matter is too great and therefore it is not surprising that the authorities have failed to meet it.

“The destruction of the mosque was the end of the campaign that wanted to bring it down anyway,” he said. “There was always the intention to overcome it,” he said. The issue was about the method used to bring it down.

“Those who mobilized Hindus against Muslims were then treated like villains by the state. They are now pardoned and treated as heroes. Their journey has transformed India into a terrifying majority state.” Is a step of

Petitioner Iqbal Ansari in Babri case welcomed the decision of the court. “It’s good that it’s over now. Let’s all live in peace Don’t let any fresh worries of this kind happen. In Ayodhya, Hindus and Muslims always live in peace.

However, Zafarib Jilani, a lawyer for the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said he would oppose the decision. “It’s a wrong decision because it’s against the evidence and the law,” he said.

STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Joe Biden casts early votes for US presidential election

Washington: Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has an early vote in his home state of Delaware for the November...

Study: Climate scientists fly more often than other subjects

New Delhi: Climate change researchers are trying to reduce their carbon footprint by avoiding air travel, but a new global study has found that...

Sargodha woman says husband handed her over to friends who raped her for 21 days

Statement of Harm to Women - News / FilesA Sargodha woman has gone to court against her husband, claiming that he sold her to...

Sindh Rangers arrest most wanted criminal in Karachi

Pakistan Rangers (Sindh) with the help of police in Gulzar-e-Hijri area of ​​Gulshan-e-Iqbal arrested accused Muhammad Israr alias Katchi on the basis of intelligence...

World Code Report: 800,000 cases in India with record infection in Germany

IndiaThe confirmed number of corona virus cases has crossed 8 million as fears mount over the growing season of Hindu festivals. It is...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -