Retired doctor launches Singapore’s gay sex ban – new legal bid to end sex and relationships

Retired doctor launches Singapore’s gay sex ban – new legal bid to end sex and relationships

A retired doctor has filed a new legal challenge to the Singapore government to fully enforce a colonial-era law or enforce the law, which could put men in prison for homosexual sex.

62-year-old Tan Seung Kei of the High Court of Singapore, known as a lawyer, this week for targeting the country’s penal code – known as Section 377A – which criminalizes homosexual sex. is.

On Friday, Tan said, “It is a belief that adversely affects the administration of law by the government to every citizen.”

“Once the administration of the law becomes inconsistent due to any government policy or action, we can appeal to the High Court or the Court,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Section 377A can imprison men for up to two years for engaging in homosexual sex, although prosecutions are rare in a modern but socially conservative city-state.

According to media reports, Singapore has a vibrant LGBT + scene and last year Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that while LGBT people are welcome to work in the country, Section 377A will remain “for a while”.

Singapore’s Interior Ministry did not respond to requests for a comment.

Tan was part of a similar challenge that focused on constitutional rights and was dismissed by the High Court in March, but now rests with the Court of Appeal.

Petitions were started in Singapore after a similar law was enacted in 2018 in India.

Across Asia, socially conservative approaches ban sexual relations between men, with Myanmar, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei, and Indonesia seeing an increase in raids targeting LGBT + people in recent years.

Tan said that the logic of discrepancies in Singapore law that is being used in the latest legal action has rarely been used before.

“There are two ways they can do this: The first way is to re-implement 377A but it would be inconceivable because it would mean that every gay person who had sex in private would have to be handed over to the police. “

“The best option would be to get rid of Section 377A and lunge into one that would eliminate all these inconsistencies, which is what I’m aiming for,” said Tan, who posted Singapore’s first Pink Dot Gay Pride rally Helped to organize

Tan said that the latest bid of the High Court is expected to be heard in 10 months, but the constitutional challenge case will succeed on the first Court of Appeal.

M. Ravi, a human rights lawyer representing Tan in his High Court bid, said not reporting or enforcing parts of the penal code – either by citizens or police – was “problematic”.

“(The government) has already acknowledged that 377A should not be actively implemented because it is considered discriminatory,” he said.

“We know they can’t go back. The only way is to repeal the 377A altogether.”

(This story is published from a wire agency feed without textual modifications.)

Follow more stories at Facebook And Twitter

STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *