The Guardian’s view on India’s agrarian uprising: Narendra Modi’s bitter harvest

India’s Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi may never have read Lord Helsham. But maybe he should. Former Lord Chancellor BBC lecture in 1976 Possibly a very complex overview of parliamentary democracy, with India being the largest version. The argument of Lord Helsham He is teaching a constitutional lesson to Mr. Modi at the right time. Conservative peers warned that Britain was in danger of becoming an “electoral dictatorship”. The parliamentary majority of the government is angry only with the political realities and the conscience of the MPs. “Only a revolution, made in a bloody or peaceful way, can end the situation,” he said.

Mr Modi won the 2019 elections. Once the powerful Congress party almost disappeared. No rival party has won enough seats to have its leader nominated as Leader of the Opposition. The judiciary has been encouraged by Mr Modi. This is not a matter of laughing Indian Muslim comedians jailed The jokes they didn’t make. Mr. Modi has an independent style. He makes decisions without any advance and expects it to become rubber. Last summer, Mr Modi enacted major farm laws that threaten the livelihoods of two-thirds of India’s 1.3 billion people. Without debate, During Parliament Quaid Lockdown. What happened next? The biggest general strike In history and Weeks of unrest. Until there is an uprising, farmers will block the capital this week, when Mr Modi is expected to receive a military salute on the occasion of the country’s Republic Day.

The Prime Minister of India says that these reforms will benefit farmers. Agriculture needs to be at least refreshed because it is The country’s water tables are rapidly depleting. But Mr Modi blocked the parliamentary inquiry Prevent farmers from raising objections Through legislators. The Supreme Court has taken action, but the judges were not honest brokers. A committee was formed to investigate the matter, which was dominated. Modi Nawaz’s voices.

Unlike the West, democracy came to India before capitalism. Mr Modi feels it was a mistake and that Lord Helshey’s “electoral dictatorship” was necessary to industrialize India. If so, they’re sorry by mistake. The new rules aim to regulate the trade of 200 million rural households, and farmers fear it will be a force to be reckoned with. Used by plutocrats. Who can blame them? Two decades ago, the bottom 50 per cent of India’s income was 20 per cent and the top 1 per cent was 14 per cent. Today Reversing position.

India’s serious age is mired in conflict. About 200 million Indians sleep on an empty stomach while government granules contain grain because the government Subsidies the purchase of rice and wheat. Yet the poor do not have enough money to buy healthy food, nor does the state guarantee food security. India needs politicians who can argue that the country should diversify its agricultural bases and create industries to increase welfare and create employment opportunities for the homeless. Should be reduced.

It requires a government that is interested in the common man, not just corporate profits that are disproportionate. Fund Mr. Modi’s party. If those who have been left behind by economic change conclude that those in power are not caring about their plight – or that they have rigged the system for the better. Mr. Modi, under the pressure of his ideological swings, offered Postpone the correction. That’s not enough. It should return to Parliament in a less thoughtful manner with fresh proposals that can be scrutinized. Suspects need to be persuaded with words, not threats. If he wants to succeed, Mr Modi has to show that he can be more democratic than sovereign.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *