TV content can take us down a slippery slope before being telecast: SC | India news

TV content can take us down a slippery slope before being telecast: SC | India news

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said that when it was obliged to take steps to protect the right of dignity of a community and a telecast should be stopped, which attempted to fully inform Muslims that they infiltrated the civil services However, it could not act as a PIL-activated sensor board for TV programs.
“We are aware of the fact that pre-publication restraint is an extreme recourse for the Supreme Court. It can take us down a slippery slope, with 900 high court judges and over 20,000 judicial officers emulating the SC Can and start giving grants. Prohibition is also given on programs broadcast by TV channels across the country for panchayat phase elections. We have a bench of Justices DY Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra and KM Joseph saying Be careful opening a clampdown front.
“We are wary of playing the role of a censor and the country has gone far beyond the era of Emergency. We do not want to get in the way of mosaic of journalistic views going to the market. But it is also a constitutional duty to protect us.” That human dignity is as important as the right to free speech. We are here to protect the solidarity of cultures and prevent the conservatism of communities. It said the way forward was to give teeth to self-regulatory mechanisms.
The hearing took place during a hearing where the court sought to balance its constitutional mandate with the obligation to maintain the dignity of individuals and communities to be wary of the role of an independent censor. Since it involves the “dignity” of individuals and communities among “reasonable” grounds to curb freedom of expression, the court also worried about the effectiveness of self-regulatory mechanisms for electronic media, and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta Asked, who are presenting for the union. The government, and Nisha Bhabani of the National Broadcasters Association, suggested on Monday how to strengthen the industry’s voluntary barriers.
“The NBA cannot take action against TV channels that are not members of it, as is the case with Sudarshan TV. The maximum penalty of 1 lakh rupees on an offending TV channel is current time and time again. We need to Must find a way out. There is an effective self-regulatory mechanism, “it said.
Mehta informed the court that the government had prepared a new law that provided for five types of penalties, including suspending the broadcasting license of a TV channel for violating the program code, and introduced a bill for introduction. Involving suggestions from stakeholders as well as the public is included before being finalized. In Parliament.
The bench gave reason for taking extreme step to stop the broadcast of Sudarshan TV’s ‘Bindas Bol’ program over alleged infiltration of central services by members of the Muslim community. The judges said that the channel tried to implicate the entire community and pointed to objectionable graphics, background videos and live chats related to the program that humiliated the Muslim community. It said that if Sudarshan TV voluntarily filed an affidavit on Monday, it would consider removing the ban as to what would make the program an investigative report. The channel agreed.
Appealing to the channel, senior advocate Shyam Dewan said that constitutional courts, which have always protected the right to full speech, would chart a dangerous course by resorting to pre-telecast ban. “Adequate regulatory mechanism is available, in law and otherwise, for those seeking redress against an aggressive program. Nobody has challenged the facts and figures presented in the program,” he said.
“Pulling a sentence around and then calling the entire program malicious towards a community would be a retaliation for free speech. If there was an idea that Muslims should try to capture civil services, a counter view Maybe. Also. The event was based on facts funded by foreign organizations related to terror to the Zakat Foundation, which paid fees for coaching Muslims for the civil services. The channel has clarified that it should be given to meritorious students. There is no objection to entering the civil services. Not even saying that all funds are linked to terror. But of course the facts have not been challenged and this is a national security issue.
The bench pointed out the objectionable graphics and background videos of the program as well as abusive comments through live chat sessions related to the broadcast. “You have every right to investigate the funding of the Zakat Foundation and present it to the public. But the problem is when you implicate the whole community. Can we go to the extent that you can give an entire community To target and accuse them of intrusion. ” Civil services? What happens when you combine an entire community with divisive propaganda, you alienate the good people of the community.
The argument will continue on Monday after the channel has filed an affidavit for correction of future episodes.

STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *