World Leaders, Virtual Meeting 1.0: Was Anyone Listening?

World Leaders, Virtual Meeting 1.0: Was Anyone Listening?

Washington: Within minutes, on a prefabricated video filmed thousands of miles away from where it was shown, the tech-savvy president of El Salvador saw two different takes of this year’s unprecedented and virtual “striking” The sides occupied. “World Leader” at UN General Assembly in 2020
On the one hand, said Naib Bukele, humanity puts the 21st-century miracle in its smartphone-clutching hands: “In a world that is almost completely connected, I can say a few words here and in the world’s farthest Can be heard in the corners of. ”
Yet in the same speech on Tuesday, he raised this current skepticism: When the people ruling the world were giving the indexed addresses to the United Nations last week, was anyone really listening?
“If you don’t believe me,” he said, “ask the first person you see.” So the planet goes. And so, too, it seems, goes to the United Nations.
The same incompatibility that technology entrusts to us in our daily lives – closer but far different, more intimate somehow colder – has revealed in the past week to a COVID-era world that even those who collectively From what we rule over all, they may not necessarily cross the data of pixels and bits that are fundamental to the way human civilization operates.
“It is clear that technology is the future,” said Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo. “How will we all keep in touch over the last six months, but for technology?” He is not wrong. And yet.
The fact is, this UN General Assembly was a very boring meeting, like opening a can of steak and preparing dinner. Sure, all the right elements were there – leaders of the world, a deep immediate slate of problems, a global platform to exclude them. But it didn’t taste right, and it wasn’t just because it was virtual. Even Circa Fall 2020, an American online classroom, is lively.
What if, say, world leaders were encouraged – or even encouraged – to live their speeches via satellite hookups? What if other leaders keep listening in real time? What if they could answer? Riskier, yes, and possible hiccups, but also more real.
Maybe something was discussed. A loose, though very electronic, connection between the speaker and the audience may be possible.
As in earlier speeches the drone was, even the most interesting kind of leaders appeared two-dimensional. The biggest signs of life came in the “Right to the North” section, where nations that do not like each other very much – Armenia and Azerbaijan, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, India and Pakistan – deliver lower-level diplomats to salvation Sent responses are often heated in real-time.
Overheat is not always productive; The US President’s debate on Tuesday night showed that. But the distance of technology has also created something new for the United Nations, an organization known for its procedural, bureaucratic nature: a meeting almost entirely free of natural energy when humans seek to shape the future of their planet Talks together.
It is not that the promise of technology was not front and center; This week’s talk dominated.
The “Roadmap for Digital Collaboration” summit was held, and dozens of world leaders spoke of the magic of electronic networks as how some of them make unimaginable connections when they are children – both governments and those who run them They are helping to offset the effects of the epidemic.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said his nation was “experimenting with ways to adapt so that this digital revolution can be erased as a source of economic opportunity for young people” and a way to develop governance and legislation .
He said that in 2020, a mix of technology and circumstance was challenging Afghanistan to “optimize the way we consume, the way we work, and the way we govern.”
Estonia’s President Kersti Kaljulaid called her nation “the world’s first digitally transformed state” – a place where all public services run online.
Because of that, she said, when the epidemic hit “we saw less scramble than any other country to move everything online, which previously ran on paper.” “We want the same for the rest of the world,” Kaljulaid said. But it also issued a warning – that technology without structure can make things worse.
“Leaders globally must understand that digital services, by themselves, do not rid any country of fat bureaucracy, corruption, or inefficiency,” she said. “By digitalizing these problems, we can only make things worse, until we simultaneously increase transparency and straighten our processes.”
Through that lens, it becomes increasingly clear that the “information superhighway,” as it was called in the 1990s, has suffered from more traffic than ever before in the coronovirus era.
William Mack, professor and coordinator of political science, says, “COVID has made an inflection point. Countries are starting to rethink how they connect with each other. This happened five years ago in the last six months. It’s hard to imagine everything that happened in India. ” Global Studies at North Central College in Naperville, Illinois.

STAY TUNED WITH US FOR MORE INTERESTING CONTENT ONLY ON DESINEW.XYZ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *